Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9378 14
Original file (NR9378 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7015. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, YA 22204-2490

 

HD

Docket No. NR9378-14
27 Marcn 42ulo

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

  
    

Sub]: ae , a
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (RECONSIDERATION

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 22 Jul 14 w/attachments
-(2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 9 Mar 15

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative
Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2005. A copy of the contested
enzry is at Tab A. Petitioner's previous request to remove the
contested page ll entry, docket number 2280-12, was gesied on 3
Ocmober 2012.

reviewed Petitioner's allegations cf error and injustice on

26 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine
Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's
case has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (*Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated
30 March 2009. This is to be accomplished by physically removing
the page 11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating
the entry so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through
it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such. entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

PVACEDA Le: batter

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a) has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14

    Original file (NR8961 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04627-10

    Original file (04627-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2007 to 2 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. Petitioner further requested removing the service record page llc (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 5 February and 4 March 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11847 12

    Original file (11847 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 27 October 2012 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Genteman and Marquez, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9397 14

    Original file (NR9397 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 22 September 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12

    Original file (06982 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

    Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6848 14

    Original file (NR6848 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the illegible service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective...